Ready-made platform
Run it on W2P Solution
A white-label print store with a built-in designer, print pricing rules and a production queue, set up and hosted by the Netbase JSC team.
A request for proposal for a web-to-print platform works when it describes the business's rules, not a feature wish list. Suppliers answer feature lists with "yes" to every line, and the differences only appear after a contract is signed. Rules are harder to agree with casually: a pricing rule either produces the known price or it does not, and a file either passes the printer's specification or it does not.
The checklist below, dated 29 September 2026, has nine sections. It is written so a buyer can use it against any supplier, including this one. Each section names what to write, what to attach and what a weak answer from a supplier sounds like.
Every product, its options and the rules between options
How each price is calculated, and who owns the rules
What production accepts and rejects
Every system an order touches, and its interface
Who can order, approve, edit and see what
File format, naming and delivery for production
The tests a delivery must pass
What must be owned, licensed or exportable
Who runs the platform after launch
Describe products as rules, not as a flat list. For each product family, state the options, their allowed values and the dependencies between them: a stock that is not available in a size, a finish that requires a minimum quantity, a fold that changes the page count. The rules between options are where configurators fail, and a supplier cannot estimate them from a product name.
Name your three hardest products explicitly. A supplier's answer about a business card says little; its answer about a folded, die-cut product with variable quantity breaks and a finishing dependency says a lot. Ask each supplier to show how its approach would model those three products.
Write the pricing rules as a function, not a price list: which inputs change the price, how quantity breaks work, how stock, size, colours and finishing combine, and which customer accounts receive different rules. Name the person who owns the rules today. If nobody owns them, that is the first finding, and it belongs in the RFP.
Attach a set of known-good quotes: real configurations with the price your business would charge today. They become the acceptance test for pricing. Leave price values out of any public document; the rules and the test quotes can be shared with suppliers under a confidentiality agreement. The print pricing engine page describes how such a rule set is formalised and accepted.
A weak supplier answer here sounds like "our pricing module is very flexible" with no statement of how your test quotes will be reproduced.
State what production accepts: page geometry with trim and bleed, colour space and printing condition, font handling, minimum resolution at final size, ink limits, and the PDF target, such as PDF/X-1a or PDF/X-4. Where a technical standard is named, it describes the output specification an engagement produces to, not a credential Web2Print Solutions holds. The seven checks behind a print-ready file are explained in print-ready PDF requirements.
Say which failures block an order and which only warn, and who reviews a warning. Attach one accepted and one rejected file for each product family. Ask each supplier how its preflight would treat the rejected file.
List every system an order touches, in order: storefront, payment, customer accounts, the production MIS or ERP, file storage, shipping and accounting. For each, state whether the connection is required at launch, its direction, and the interface the system offers: an API, a file drop or hot folder, a JDF or XJDF job ticket, or a procurement protocol such as cXML PunchOut for corporate buyers.
Be exact about the production system. An integration with an MIS is only as good as the interface the MIS vendor sanctions, and a supplier that promises to integrate without seeing the interface is guessing. The web-to-print MIS integration page lists what such an integration has to handle, including duplicate submission, reconciliation and status mapping.
Roles and approvals change the data model, so they belong in the RFP from the start. List every account type: retail customer, business account, account buyer, approver, brand administrator, customer service and production operator. For each, state what it may order, edit, approve and see. Describe approval steps with their triggers, such as an order above a quantity threshold or a template edit outside brand rules.
Corporate and franchise buyers often need brand-locked templates, cost-centre fields and approval chains. A platform that adds these after launch usually has to restructure accounts and orders, which is slower than designing them in.
If this checklist has surfaced sections your team cannot fill in yet, send a project brief with the sections you have and a note of the ones you do not. A discovery engagement can write the missing sections with you. Suppliers can respond through a web-to-print implementation service.
Specify the production output exactly: file format and PDF target, one file for each item or one for each order, naming convention, job ticket or metadata, delivery route to production, and what happens when output generation fails. If production imposes files itself, say so; if the platform must impose or gang jobs, specify sheet sizes and marks. Attach the printer's written file specification. An RFP that says only "print-ready PDF" will receive proposals that each mean something different by it.
Write acceptance tests as orders with expected results. Each test names a configuration, the artwork supplied, the expected price, the expected preflight outcome, the expected output file and the expected state in the production system. Include failure cases: a rejected file, a disallowed option combination, a duplicate submission, an approval refused.
State who runs the tests, on which environment, and who signs acceptance. Tests written before the proposal protect both sides: the buyer knows what is being bought, and the supplier knows what done means. How we work describes the acceptance route used on this site's engagements.
Ask each supplier to state, in writing, what the buyer will own at the end, what is licensed and on which terms, and what can be exported if the relationship ends: product data, customer accounts, orders, artwork and pricing rules. Ask how any fee scales as volume grows, and what happens to the platform if a subscription or licence stops. This site publishes no prices, rates, day rates or payment terms, and the RFP does not need them to answer this question.
Expect a mixed answer from most suppliers, including this one. Client-specific deliverables, access and handover are defined in the engagement contract. Pre-existing software, products, APIs and third-party components remain subject to their respective ownership and licence terms. The RFP should make each supplier draw that line explicitly rather than leave it to the contract stage. The choice between approaches is compared in web-to-print build options, and once a custom build is the chosen route, when to build a custom print platform compares who should execute it: a vendor's team, an in-house team, a generalist shop or a specialist agency.
Describe who will run the platform after launch and what support you need: monitoring, security patching, platform upgrades, incident response, backups with tested restores, and a route for small changes. State your hours of operation and time zones rather than asking for round-the-clock cover by default. Ask each supplier what it will and will not support, and how an incident is reported, triaged and closed. If accessibility matters to your buyers, name the target, for example WCAG 2.2 level AA, and include it in acceptance.
Score each response against the nine sections, weighted by what matters to the business. Give more weight to answers that engage with the attached test quotes, files and interfaces than to general capability statements. A response that asks good questions about your hardest products is usually worth more than one that answers every line with "supported".
| RFP section | A weak answer | A strong answer |
|---|---|---|
| Products and options | Speaks about an easy product, such as a standard business card | Models the three hardest products you named, including the dependencies between options |
| Pricing rules | "Our pricing module is very flexible," with no statement of how your test quotes will be reproduced | Reproduces your attached known-good quotes exactly |
| Artwork and preflight | No engagement with the attached rejected file | States plainly how its preflight would treat the attached rejected file |
| Integrations | Promises to integrate without having seen the production system's interface | Engages directly with the interface documentation or sample export you attached |
| Acceptance tests | A general capability statement, with no reference to your attached tests | Engages with the attached test quotes, files and interfaces directly |
We can run a paid discovery engagement that produces an architecture, an explicit pricing-rule specification, an integration inventory and a phased plan you could hand to another supplier. The output of a discovery engagement is written so that a supplier other than us can execute it. Web-to-print architecture and discovery describes that engagement. Terms used on this page are defined in the web-to-print glossary. Live stores scoped through a written requirements process are listed on the live web-to-print stores evidence page.
(opens the full-size diagram in a new tab)
This checklist is general. A regulated buyer, a public-sector tender or a multi-country rollout will need sections it does not cover, such as data residency, procurement law and localisation. It does not rank suppliers or products. Web2Print Solutions claims no certification, accreditation, audit result or named compliance standard as a held credential. Web2Print Solutions is the web-to-print engineering service of Netbase JSC. Delivery records cited on this site belong to Netbase JSC; where no delivered example of a capability is published, the page says so rather than implying a record. No RFP answered by this property is published here.
Long enough to hold the nine sections and their attachments, and no longer. The attachments carry most of the value: known-good quotes, accepted and rejected files, interface documentation and test orders. A short RFP with strong attachments beats a long one with none.
Include pricing rules and test quotes, shared under a confidentiality agreement, because suppliers need them to test pricing. Keep them out of any public tender notice. Ask suppliers to describe how their own fees are structured rather than asking for a single figure too early.
Then the first step is to write them, not to send the RFP. A discovery engagement, run by any supplier or by an in-house team, can produce the missing sections, which the RFP then uses as its basis.
Yes. The nine sections describe the business, not an approach, so they apply to all four build options. Each approach will answer some sections by configuration and others by engineering, and the comparison becomes visible.
Ready-made platform
A white-label print store with a built-in designer, print pricing rules and a production queue, set up and hosted by the Netbase JSC team.
Commissioned build
When the workflow needs rules, integrations or a configurator a standard edition does not cover, the Netbase engineering team scopes and builds it.
Tell us about one product you want to sell online. A senior engineer reads every brief and replies in writing.